|
Post by thekeep on Nov 8, 2018 3:20:43 GMT
good job indeed. just on the last picture, is that fur underneath the rip cage? that seems a bit weird. The figure is weird that way.... looks like wires on top of the fur!
|
|
|
Post by mottdon on Nov 8, 2018 13:03:03 GMT
You could simply say it was how the ribs grew out of it's transformation. They burst forth from one point and wrapped around the outside of it's skin/fur. Kinda like it's doing along it's spine/tail and other areas like it's knees. Doesn't necessarily indicate rotting flesh.
|
|
|
Post by midnightfox0083 on Nov 8, 2018 13:15:08 GMT
I've always taken it as there's just balding areas where the ribs meet the skin. Both studio schemes use the flesh color on them rather than the bone colors.
|
|
|
Post by mottdon on Nov 8, 2018 13:53:28 GMT
Well, GW doesn't have the best record with color choices....
|
|
|
Post by thekeep on Nov 8, 2018 15:42:36 GMT
Ok, check out my fully armed and operational Witch Hunter Warband! Ok, so.... GW’s Purity Seal is satin now instead of flat... ugh Instagram: thekeepgames
|
|
|
Post by thekeep on Nov 8, 2018 15:45:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by strutsagget on Nov 8, 2018 19:15:21 GMT
It looks great
|
|
|
Post by thekeep on Nov 9, 2018 21:24:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by strutsagget on Nov 10, 2018 11:25:21 GMT
It looks fabulous. looks like we use more terrain in our games compared to yours.
|
|
|
Post by thekeep on Nov 10, 2018 12:28:49 GMT
It looks fabulous. looks like we use more terrain in our games compared to yours. Oh? Do you use the rule book d6+4 pieces of terrain? I tried that a bit ago and it made for a hugely crowded table. This particular week was just a two player game and we could have used more terrain, but in general we have 3-4 players and more terrain means almost no movement with all those armies on the table. Do you find more terrain the better the game? Do you use the rule book terrain features? We do about half the time, and usually forget the special rules regarding them!
|
|
|
Post by strutsagget on Nov 10, 2018 12:46:27 GMT
It looks fabulous. looks like we use more terrain in our games compared to yours. Oh? Do you use the rule book d6+4 pieces of terrain? I tried that a bit ago and it made for a hugely crowded table. This particular week was just a two player game and we could have used more terrain, but in general we have 3-4 players and more terrain means almost no movement with all those armies on the table. Do you find more terrain the better the game? Do you use the rule book terrain features? We do about half the time, and usually forget the special rules regarding them! We have not tried the BrB rules, but we usually roll for scenario and then try to add as much we are all comfortable with. As I am usually the receiving end of WM I want a lot and as my friends run WM they want as few as possible. So we end up with 2-3 woods 1-2 houses and way too many hills as the battle realm have 4 included We always forget to roll for woods magical but have recently started to pick it up again. We are in the discussion of using the brb or the system added here on eefl by knoffles: eefl.freeforums.net/thread/614/alternative-terrain-selectionBut as time is limited we usually fall back to what's fastest.
|
|
|
Post by larabic on Nov 11, 2018 17:05:43 GMT
We have not tried the BrB rules, but we usually roll for scenario and then try to add as much we are all comfortable with. As I am usually the receiving end of WM I want a lot and as my friends run WM they want as few as possible. So we end up with 2-3 woods 1-2 houses and way too many hills as the battle realm have 4 included We always forget to roll for woods magical but have recently started to pick it up again. We are in the discussion of using the brb or the system added here on eefl by knoffles : eefl.freeforums.net/thread/614/alternative-terrain-selectionBut as time is limited we usually fall back to what's fastest. When you use woods do you use them the old way where you can't see through both sides or through 3" or do you use the true line of sight? Just curious.
|
|
|
Post by strutsagget on Nov 11, 2018 17:58:32 GMT
We have not tried the BrB rules, but we usually roll for scenario and then try to add as much we are all comfortable with. As I am usually the receiving end of WM I want a lot and as my friends run WM they want as few as possible. So we end up with 2-3 woods 1-2 houses and way too many hills as the battle realm have 4 included We always forget to roll for woods magical but have recently started to pick it up again. We are in the discussion of using the brb or the system added here on eefl by knoffles : eefl.freeforums.net/thread/614/alternative-terrain-selectionBut as time is limited we usually fall back to what's fastest. When you use woods do you use them the old way where you can't see through both sides or through 3" or do you use the true line of sight? Just curious. Sorry for threadjacking. We use a true line of sight so far but the full woods base as a light cover if you shoot through. But then I use 4ground and thick trees that break line of sight in some cases and not gw woods.
|
|
|
Post by thekeep on Nov 11, 2018 19:00:17 GMT
No worries!! Larabic is one of my player buddies!!
|
|
|
Post by thekeep on Nov 12, 2018 19:48:25 GMT
Getting closer!! Dire Wolves in progress: Hopefully going to look like these: Instagram: thekeepgames
|
|