How do you normally play?

These days we are mostly doing small T&T games as that works best with time/availability of people. In the past we typically rolled for scenarios from the rulebook (though maybe replace the watchtower with a hill or forest). They are relatively simple yet importantly some scenarios put certain extreme army compositions at an disadvantage. This forces people somewhat into more sane armies that can adapt and have some flexibility (or alternatively just makes them complain more e.g. when the highly optimized VC army doesn't get to march as the general was forced to deploy way over on the left).

Then there is more elaborate scenarios in the back of the BRB and of course you have discovered the homebrew section here.

We have played mostly Battleline with open lists and terrain pieces that we choose in turns. The most simple set-up helps to get in touch with armies and rules, but it isn't the best match-up for all armies. Now we are changing to closed lists and randomized scenarios rolling from BRB.

For additional scenarios, old General's Compendium has an excellent frozen river -scenario that we have played many times. We have even a full 6x4 gaming board made for that scenario alone. From Warhammer: Thanquol we used the "Ancient Temple Cities" -rules, which are basically a Treasure Hunt. It worked well in a longer campaign at least.

I would add a question: how do you choose the terrain pieces? If you randomize, do you roll from the BRB? I find that the chart has too many special elements, magical terrain pieces and such. D6+4 seems also quite a lot of pieces, in bigger games (3000+) the board gets easily crowded. We would like to randomize the terrain pieces used, but I would like it to be a bit more mundane than eight pieces of arcane structures and magical marshes. I have not found from anywhere how this was done in the tournaments of old; the ETC rules and Swedish Comp rules that I have seen do not have any mentions about placing terrain pieces.

IIRC in tournaments the terrain is set up in advance by the staff to be reasonably neutral for all the armies, and generally special terrain types are not used or used very sparingly.

If I were writing the terrain rules, my chart would be much more heavily weighted toward normal terrain - forest, fields, buildings, fences and walls, etc. Special and magical terrain would be a lot more rare. But that's me; others may find the preponderance of magical terrain a big part of the fun.

Mostly Battle line but info like playing the core and narrative scenarios in the rulebook.

Triumph and Treachery is loads of fun. It's the best way I've found to play with more than two players.

I personally love loads of terrain, even though I love my Empire knights and Chaos chariots. I think it makes the game a much more tactical one and makes you have to work harder to control the objective markers because you have to think about movement and positioning more.

We usually just have a good old bash with our armies, some scenery and the six scenarios from the Warhammer Rulebook, though in an upcoming game we're going to be replaying the scenario in the 3rd Edition book - Forenrond's Last Stand - with my up-to-date High Elf and Greenskin armies.