|
|
Post by johngg on Aug 22, 2021 6:34:11 GMT
You will have a problem with that one  How so? |
|
|
|
Post by knoffles on Aug 23, 2021 17:14:30 GMT
If you are redacting, you should probably remove the picture as that was a dead giveaway 😂. I’ve noticed the individuals response comments a few times in various FB groups when he doesn’t agree with something. He’s normally pretty even keeled, at least in the one group he’s an admin of.
|
|
|
|
Post by DiscoQing on Aug 23, 2021 20:25:29 GMT
Nah its OK - I just didn't want his name/image somewhere else.
The contents of his words are fair game, 😜
|
|
|
|
Post by FvonSigmaringen on Aug 23, 2021 21:49:40 GMT
knoffles: A comment perhaps better issued by PM than post. Now, everyone's attention has been focused on the elephant in the room.
|
|
|
|
Post by strutsagget on Aug 26, 2021 6:54:47 GMT
Well he did have a couple of nice worded sentences when he got kicked out of the old world Facebook group. |
|
|
|
Post by johngg on Aug 26, 2021 8:37:13 GMT
strutsagget : Why? It is not exactly a problem from the twilight zone. Same principle: the Cloak provides a ward save "against wounds caused by shooting attacks and spells." ABH is a spell that allows ward saves. Hence, the Cloak works. Indeed, if I were facetious, I could even read the description as "against [wounds caused by shooting attacks] and spells.... Precisely |
|
|
|
Post by strutsagget on Aug 26, 2021 8:43:46 GMT
strutsagget : Why? It is not exactly a problem from the twilight zone. Same principle: the Cloak provides a ward save "against wounds caused by shooting attacks and spells." ABH is a spell that allows ward saves. Hence, the Cloak works. Indeed, if I were facetious, I could even read the description as "against [wounds caused by shooting attacks] and spells.... Precisely Did you read the post after? |
|
|
|
Post by johngg on Aug 26, 2021 8:53:02 GMT
Did you read the post after? I did, but I do not know of the person or the case your are referring to. If you'd like to elaborate on either though.... |
|
