|
Post by johngg on May 17, 2022 8:51:43 GMT
Fvon, you are cherry picking parts of rules and not reading the whole text. Which is hugely ironic for you 😂.
You have also discovered some sort of hierarchy of precedence for rules. If this hierarchy does actually exist, please sign post us to it.
|
|
|
Post by FvonSigmaringen on May 17, 2022 13:49:53 GMT
Fvon, you are cherry picking parts of rules and not reading the whole text. Which is hugely ironic for you 😂. Yes, that is a hugely ironic reproach coming from someone who has brought forward here not a single argument based on the rules, let alone quote a rule, against someone who consistently has. You have also discovered some sort of hierarchy of precedence for rules. If this hierarchy does actually exist, please sign post us to it. Hmm, I did not expect the Span... euh, no, that we have to go back to some basic principles. Of course, there is such a hierarchy: Erratum/Amendment > BRB Advanced > basic rules AB > BRB. All of which boils down to "Normal rules apply, unless specifically stated otherwise," a principle I have advocated numerous times and always try to adhere to. That said, my argument is not even based on any hierarchy - it is based on applicability. You have claimed earlier I would misrepresent your position, but in truth, you have never clearly spelled it out, nor supported it with ANY argument based on the rules. I guess, the most elaborate form is this: The banner states who benefits, yes, the whole unit, which includes the Wizard. The spell states who is targeted, yes, the Wizard, who is still in unit. QED the two do indeed intersect. Well, the first sentence already contains a glaring error: the banner does not state that the whole unit benefits - it is only the Wizard who casts a spell from the Lore of Life or Light which targets the unit that contains the BoA - whether that Wizard is within or without the unit. The second sentence we can agree on, but the conclusion from both is simply a non sequitur. To requote the rule: The description of the BoA states (High Elves AB p. 59): "Spells from the Lore of Light and the Lore of Life cast by a friendly Wizard that target a unit containing the Banner of Avelorn receive a +4 bonus to cast." So, the following conditions must be met for the bonus: 1. It must be a spell from the Lore of Light or the Lore of Life (we'll take that as a given) 2. It must be cast by a friendly Wizard (we'll take that also as a given). 3. It must be a spell that targets a unit (that is the crux of the matter) 4. It must be a unit that contains the BoA (obviously, we'll take that as a given too). The bonus does not work, if any of the 4 conditions is not met, but number 3 is the crux of the matter, which, as pointed out several times before, you have not actually addressed a single time here. It must be a spell that targets a unit. If it does not target the unit, you do not get the bonus. Please, provide a rules based argument that a spell which expressis verbis only targets a Wizard, also targets the unit he is in. There is none, and, as shown above, if applied, the idea renders itself absurd.
|
|
|
Post by johngg on May 17, 2022 15:07:46 GMT
If I ever play anyone that thinks Throne of Vines affects the whole unit, I'm going to throw all my mages into the same unit then. I'm pretty sure NOONE has suggested this
|
|
|
Post by johngg on May 17, 2022 15:16:16 GMT
chap, you've undone yourself on so many levels. However, I shall ask for a fourth and final time..... Which rule, implied or otherwise, gives express permission to ignore the fact that the Banner of Avelon affects any single model within a unit. If you can expressly answer this, directly, as I have asked three times before, [which so far you have failed to do so] we all will be most happy. If you cannot, you will conceed the point?
|
|
|
Post by FvonSigmaringen on May 17, 2022 15:36:26 GMT
chap, you've undone yourself on so many levels. However, I shall ask for a fourth and final time..... Which rule, implied or otherwise, gives express permission to ignore the fact that the Banner of Avelon affects any single model within a unit. If you can expressly answer this, directly, as I have asked three times before, [which so far you have failed to do so] we all will be most happy. If you cannot, you will conceed the point? I have answered every time, even in my previous post, you just keep ignoring it. It is in the description of the BoA itself: "Spells from the Lore of Light and the Lore of Life cast by a friendly Wizard that target a unit containing the Banner of Avelorn receive a +4 bonus to cast." Where does it say here that the BoA affects any single model within the unit? It does not affect models at all, but spells.
|
|
|
Post by johngg on May 17, 2022 15:52:06 GMT
chap, you've undone yourself on so many levels. However, I shall ask for a fourth and final time..... Which rule, implied or otherwise, gives express permission to ignore the fact that the Banner of Avelon affects any single model within a unit. If you can expressly answer this, directly, as I have asked three times before, [which so far you have failed to do so] we all will be most happy. If you cannot, you will conceed the point? I have answered every time, even in my previous post, you just keep ignoring it. It is in the description of the BoA itself: "Spells from the Lore of Light and the Lore of Life cast by a friendly Wizard that target a unit containing the Banner of Avelorn receive a +4 bonus to cast." Where does it say here that the BoA affects any single model within the unit? It does not affect models at all, but spells. So no, you havent answered my question, for the fourth time. Re-read the question again, if you must. That wording does not make exception to the fact the the Banner of Avelorn affects the Unit, and therefore every model IN that unit, as per the rules [As Horace pointed out in his post previously] Please, if you know of a rule, impiled orotherwise, which counters this, please, for the fith time of asking now, show us.
|
|
|
Post by johngg on May 17, 2022 15:55:14 GMT
I'm very happy to be proved wrong, you just havent done that yet...
|
|
|
Post by FvonSigmaringen on May 17, 2022 16:07:29 GMT
A magic item does what it says in its description - nothing less, nothing more. Nor did Horace quote any rule (and I am sure he will agree) that said the Banner of Avelorn, in spite of its description, affects the Unit, and therefore every model IN that unit. Such a rule simply does not exist.
|
|
|
Post by johngg on May 17, 2022 16:43:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by johngg on May 17, 2022 16:44:12 GMT
Literally, horace’s quote, quoting the rulebook.
|
|
|
Post by johngg on May 17, 2022 16:44:43 GMT
A magic item does what it says in its description - nothing less, nothing more. Nor did Horace quote any rule (and I am sure he will agree) that said the Banner of Avelorn, in spite of its description, affects the Unit, and therefore every model IN that unit. Such a rule simply does not exist. Now stop being obnoxious, it’s unbecoming of you.
|
|
|
Post by FvonSigmaringen on May 17, 2022 22:06:49 GMT
If I were obnoxious, it would only be because your entire method of reasoning makes no sense whatsoever. One non sequitur "follows" another. How does this
in any way, shape or form have any relevance to this?
Just like the combined units rule does not have relevance if e.g. a character within a combined unit would wield the Biting Blade. Would the Biting Blade now affect every model in the unit? Of course not. Unless a magic item (or any other effect for that matter) affects the unit, the combined units rule simply does not come into play. The BoA does not affect the unit - it affects spells.
|
|
|
Post by Horace on May 17, 2022 22:38:41 GMT
I quoted that bit cos I see where you're coming from and I don't think it's super clear, but I do still side with Fvons general interpretation and breakdown of which spells get/don't get the bonus. Don't think it's a huge deal anyway tbh, not something I would personally get too bothered about
|
|
|
Post by thegoat on May 17, 2022 23:13:04 GMT
It is difficult to present an argument against your interpretation because your logic is so bizarre. The rule you quoted (and are basing your argument on) is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Yes the wizard and the unit containing the Banner of Avelorn which he joined Voltron together into a new unit that also contains the Banner of Avelorn. If that Voltron unit is targeted by a spell Banner of Avelorn is triggered. But if the wizard is targeted by himself (even while he is inside the unit) Banner of Avelorn doesn't trigger. The wizard being a part of the Voltron unit, doesn't stop him from also being a character and a wizard. If a spell targets him because he is a character or a wizard, it doesn't count as targeting the Voltron unit.
|
|
|
Post by johngg on May 18, 2022 11:42:57 GMT
Yes the wizard and the unit containing the Banner of Avelorn which he joined Voltron together into a new unit that also contains the Banner of Avelorn. If that Voltron unit is targeted by a spell Banner of Avelorn is triggered. But if the wizard is targeted by himself (even while he is inside the unit) Banner of Avelorn doesn't trigger. The wizard being a part of the Voltron unit, doesn't stop him from also being a character and a wizard. If a spell targets him because he is a character or a wizard, it doesn't count as targeting the Voltron unit. This is my only point of discussion. You are dissasociating the wizard from the unit. All I am asking is for evidence of a rule which does that. And yet, so far, none has been provided.
|
|