|
|
Post by KevinC on Jul 20, 2015 12:03:00 GMT
Do you guys think the Lord-Celestant on the "battle-cat" from the AOS box set should be a monster or monstrous cav?
|
|
|
|
Post by Anton on Jul 20, 2015 13:29:59 GMT
Monstrous Cav. It's about the size of a Demigrpyph. Monster would hardly be off either though.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheREALricksalamone on Jul 20, 2015 13:53:43 GMT
I vote monster, as you know.
|
|
|
|
Post by avatarofbugman on Jul 20, 2015 17:19:57 GMT
Monstrous cav. It is smaller than most of the existing monster mounts.
|
|
|
|
Post by mottdon on Jul 20, 2015 18:45:52 GMT
At first glance, I'd say Mostrous Cav. if the rules fit it appropriately. But saying that, the IoB did have a character riding a griffon. What did that class as? I'd say it should probably follow suit.
|
|
|
|
Post by avatarofbugman on Jul 21, 2015 1:54:03 GMT
Good point mottdon
|
|
|
|
Post by KevinC on Jul 21, 2015 2:37:01 GMT
If we judge on how AOS rules work, monster models such a Griffons and Hippogryphs have 10-13 Wounds and a chart that describes how they are weakened. While the Dracoth (battle-cat) has wounds akin to a normal hero on mount and no monster-like table.
I think I'm going with Monstrous Cav...
|
|
|
|
Post by TheREALricksalamone on Jul 21, 2015 3:00:20 GMT
Alright alright alright.
|
|
|
|
Post by wilsonthenarc on Jul 21, 2015 22:32:56 GMT
MonCav
|
|
|
|
Post by mottdon on Jul 22, 2015 19:41:30 GMT
Does he come partially attached to this Battle Cat or separately? If separate, you could always put him on a Griffon. I think he'd look rather cool up there.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheREALricksalamone on Jul 22, 2015 20:42:01 GMT
All of the new stuff is very dynamic...but so dynamic that there's no room for conversion of kit swapping.
|
|
