|
Post by DiscoQing on Jul 28, 2024 17:07:13 GMT
I would say they're less likely to "protect him", but be inspired by him; And create a sub-cult of armoured followers.
|
|
|
Post by caniuslanium on Jul 30, 2024 21:02:30 GMT
There should be absolutes and armoured slayers is one of those heresies that deserves worse than obliteration
|
|
A sassy night goblin
Guest
|
Post by A sassy night goblin on Jul 31, 2024 17:00:50 GMT
Hear me out, what if the hammerers took a modified oath, to help them deal with their oaths to protect their liege. Perhaps they swear that they will still act as shield and protect him at the cost of their own lives, however they will never recruit new members and slowly dwindle out battle after battle, etc.
|
|
|
Post by KevinC on Aug 2, 2024 14:33:43 GMT
There should be absolutes and armoured slayers is one of those heresies that deserves worse than obliteration ---------------Then you must not like the entire concept of King Ungrim himself? He's been in Dwarf lore since 1992/93. Ultimately if you don't like a concept, the good thing is you don't have to include the unit in your army - ignore them. "Life itself is an exercise exceptions." - Jean-Luc Picard
|
|